Posts Tagged ‘Books’

hobbited

Posted 12 Jan 2010 — by Jonathan
Category Daft, General

I don’t really get the whole Lord of The Rings thing, personally – what little affection I have it for it springs from childhood memories of listening to The Hobbit on cassette (although I never got through it), and the animated film from 1978, which scared me senseless when I was young. The Peter Jackson remakes were OK; involving and exciting in parts but desperately over-long and ever so reverential.

But! I am enjoying Natalie Podrazik’s Hobbited Blog more than I can say. Natalie is, unbelievably, just about the last person on Earth who knows nothing about Lord of The Rings, and is thus blogging her first encounter with Bilbo Baggins et al from a position of complete innocence. Her bewilderment and good humour make this an essential winter read. I hope she sticks with it longer than I did those blasted audiotapes.

Here she is getting frustrated with Gandalf.

First of all, Gandalf leads his trusted peers to the woods and proclaims that he’s not going in there with “you people”. He YP’d them! His own crew!

“It is no use arguing. I have, as I told you, some pressing business away south; and I am already late through bothering with you people. We may meet again before all is over, and then again of course we may not.”

Who called this mission to order? Gandalf. And he’s ditching the crew. Sup with that? What about wolves? What about trolls or goblins? He took the wicked swords AND the horse from bear-man and made everyone else return their ponies, and now he wants them all to march into a deep dark forest and maybe he’ll see them on the other side. Can they walk around? Yeah, but its hundreds of miles, Gandalf says. Hmmm, how does that phrase go, again? “F*** you. No smiley.” I think that’s it.

By the way, just remembered that I had two goldfish called Bilbo and Baggins when I was a kid. Over the years, however, their names evolved into, er, Fish 1 and Fish 2. There’s another example of me not giving Tolkein due reverence. Fish 1 lived longest but then developed some kind of weird growth and got all listless. Those were dark days.

to be or not to be

Posted 14 Dec 2009 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Daft

Perhaps I’m softening in my old age – not sure I’d have spent much time watching youtube videos of cute kids a few years ago – but this is just lovely. The actor Brian Cox coaches a 30 month year old toddler to recite Shakespeare. Extremely sweet.

the london perambulator

Posted 06 Dec 2009 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Reviews

A couple of weeks ago myself, Vic, Dan, Ant and Alec went down to the Sallis Benney Theatre to see the screening, as part of the Cinecity Brighton Film Festival, of John Rogers’ new film, London Perambulator, a wonderfully affectionate portrait of Nick Papadimitriou, a writer who lives in North London – in my old haunting ground of Barnet, no less – who dedicates his life to the pursuit of what he calls ‘deep topography’; what you and I might have heard described as ‘pyscho-geography’ – urban exploration through the medium of walking, enacted not through pre-researched routes but by chance and happenstance, working on the assumption that the mysteries of the landscape will be revealed through being ‘found’.

As that muddled definition implies, the practice of deep topography is an inexact thing, occupying a vague, semi-mystical space between geography, anthropology, philosophy, art and science. What Nick Papadimitriou does, essentially, is walk through the overlooked corners of cities, and writes about his experience. His preoccupation is not with finding conventional beauty, whether ancient or modern, but rather in examining the functional areas where mankind, nature, and necessity overlap. In the process of this obsession, which sees him undertaking long ruminative walks, creating a kind of philosophical mind-map of the city, he has carried out research – and acted as somewhat of a poetic muse – for the likes of Will Self and Iain Sinclair (whose own book, ‘London Orbital’, sparked my interest in this area).

Papadimitriou is self-evidently an idiosyncratic individual, pursuing with admirable single-mindedness a line of enquiry which many would dismiss as eccentric. Rogers’ film cannot help but play on this, observing its protagonist in reveries of post-industrial romanticism, waxing lyrical over water treatment plants and manhole covers, standing rapt on brownfield sites transfixed by concrete posts. As one might expect of a close confidante of Will Self, Papadimitriou is not only incredibly literate but also extremely funny. So it’s easy for the film to poke affectionate fun at him, not least because a contributor like Russell Brand – who is insightful throughout – can’t resist sending him up.

Speaking after the film – which is only 45 minutes long – Papadimitriou expressed a little wry frustration at the fact. And that is understandable; there is something innately comic about the intensity of his passion for, say, Mogdon Water Treatment Plant – but the film plays up his eccentricity without sacrificing the opportunity to include many thought provoking and poetic displays of language and thought. And the more involved with his subject matter he gets the more profoundly interesting he becomes. It’s in Middlesex, that absent county at the top of London that was folded into Hertfordshire, Surrey and Greater London but which retains a geographical presence of its own, that his most fervent interest resides, and for a period in the film I found myself transported back to the vocabulary of my youth – Barnet, Southgate, Potters Bar, Finchley, Hendon. Papadimitriou is not myopic in his interests – he has a long term plan to walk across the Ukraine – but it’s obvious where his heart resides. He tells us:

“My ambition is to hold my region in my mind… so that I am the region. So that when I die I literally do become Middlesex in some way. For me that is my highest spiritual aspiration, I will be the tarmac that you race along on the A41-T, I’ll be absorbed into the mildewed lintels hidden in overgrown knotweed by the side of the Hendon way…”

My own youth was spent mapping out this part of the world; rambling through Hadley Wood, waiting for tubes into the city at Oakwood station, tracing cycle paths through Totteridge, scrabbling over high fences to let off firecrackers behind the Sainsbury’s car-park in New Barnet. I’m not especially nostalgic for those years, but Papadimitriou’s enthusiasm is infectious. I understood him best, I think, when he stopped suddenly between two semi-detached houses in a glum suburb, and pointed out the contour of the ageless landscape through the gap; where a river once flowed. These buildings, he pointed out, could be destroyed in moments, but it would take something immense to change the shape of land which has held its form for thousands of years.

I’m not sure I fully understand to what end his infectious, limitless enthusiasm can be taken, but in his current role, mid way between philosopher and naturalist, urban historian and dreamer, it strikes me that Nick Papadimitriou is doing something terribly important – chronicling parts of the city which are all around but rarely seen; liminal, overgrown, ambiguous places where mankind has made marks on nature which we would do well not to forget. Their unsystematic, unresolved, chaotic distribution seems to have some significance when counterbalanced against our own unsystematic, unresolved, chaotic lives.

You can watch a short clip of John Rogers’ incredibly enjoyable film below, visit his website here, or download the regular podcasts (“Ventures and Adventures in Topography”) which he and Nick make for Resonance FM here. Nick’s own website, misleadingly named Middlesex County Council, and as chaotic a site as you might expect, is essential reading. Here’s the link.

http://www.middlesexcountycouncil.org.uk/

book people

Posted 29 Apr 2009 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Observations

Some amazing quotes in tonight’s episode of the Apprentice. The young bucks are stood in a Charing Cross Road book shop while a pair of studious booksellers carefully examine some literature they’ve been given to sell. Quietly, diligently, they set about making a valuation. They take their time, because they are methodical people. The Apprentices are outraged at this abuse of their time.

“We can’t take any more shit from them” Ben cries.

His colleague agrees. “You know what they’re like, though”, she replies. “They’re book people, they want to waste your time”.

He nods, crossly. “I’m fed up with these book people talking shit to me for too long”.

Moment of realisation. That’s me, isn’t it?

zipless poetry

Posted 12 Apr 2009 — by Jonathan
Category Books

The other night I dropped by McNally Jackson, a really lovely independent bookstore in New York’s SoHo, to see Erica Jong read from her new collection of poems, Love Comes First. I’m a huge fan of Jong’s brilliant, fabulously rude ‘Fear of Flying’, so it was great to see her talk and a pleasure to hear her witty and wise poetry, which is simultaneously accessible and thought-provoking, as you’d expect from a writer of Jong’s stature. That’s not to say, however, that I’d swap her prose for her poems. I’ve spent much of my time in the US reading the poems of John Ashbery, and Jong is not in the same class. But that’s a mean observation to make, and perhaps an unworthy comment. What’s more important is that I really enjoyed Jong’s reading, and am very glad I caught it.

red riding good

Posted 05 Mar 2009 — by Jonathan
Category Books

Bit early for a post-mortem on Red Riding, but… wow – massively intense and frightening, and it seemed both seriously artistic and bitingly realistic simultaneously, which is surely a hard thing to achieve. Some of the camera work was sublime, especially the framing and use of focus – but most significant was the depth of Peace’s plotting and the brilliance of the adaptation. Acting not far behind.

Going to bed seems like a mad thing to do now. I need to find something soothing on Radio 4 before I can contemplate sleep.

the movements of a plant underwater

Posted 13 Oct 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

This is from Tim Parks’ lovely, teasing new novel, ‘Dreams of Rivers And Seas’:

Elaine was kind to him, but busy. In the past, she had been the vulnerable one. Now she had her rehearsals, she had a place in the world. Practising her mime in the sitting room, she swayed round the sofa with staring eyes, arms waving languidly. ‘After the explosion,’ she said. ‘I’m supposed to be looking for my baby. But how can I really know what it would be like after an explosion?’

John watched her, her arms and wrists in particular. They were the movements of a plant underwater, he thought.

take it back

Posted 13 Oct 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

This is rather marvellous; Marcel Reich-Ranicki, a German literary critic – who has been made the recipient of a lifetime achievement award in the country’s annual TV backslapping ceremony – has reacted in the customarily curmudgeonly way which we have come to expect from eminent literary types; he’s handed it back and had a jolly good moan, too – wonderful.

From The Guardian:

“I don’t belong here among all this rubbish,” the 88-year-old critic and author said from the stage of the annual German Television Awards gala in Cologne. “I have been given many literature prizes in my life, but I don’t belong in this line-up. If the prize was linked with money, I would have given the cash back too.”

But not just declined to attend, obviously.

birthday fun

Posted 06 Oct 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Observations

- It’s two o’clock in the morning the day after my birthday, and I am standing in Dan’s bedroom with my arms flailing around. To my right, Dan is doing the same. Victoria stands opposite, and she is bent double with laughter. Eva is shouting “Now!” at me. At that moment an inflatable globe hits from me, as if from nowhere, square in the face. The room flashes repeatedly from dark to light.

- My birthday is passed now, and my hangover fully faded, so I can look back objectively on another really pleasant anniversary spent in the company of my friends. On Friday I went for a quick drink with AS and Rich, which was ace, and met up with Dan, Morgan and Ant too before I dashed out for dinner with Siobhan, and then on Saturday night pretty much my whole group of friends accompanied me out to the Crescent for a night of drinking and cheering – and lots of lovely and extremely well-chosen present-giving, too.

- Lots of bird-related presents this year, which is wonderful. I appear to be fast developing a reputation as the bird-man of Brighton, although I think it vital that I point out that my love of my feathered friends is primarily aesthetic and cultural rather than ornithological; but Ant hit the nail on the head exactly with his present, Graeme Gibson’s ‘The Bedside Book Of Birds’, which is the most beautiful anthology of poems, stories and illustrations pertaining to the amazing little animals. That may sound boring to some, but it’s not, so anyone with an interest should scurry to the bookshop in search of a copy immediately. Elsewhere, I got a host of amazing pressies, including wonderful books from AS, Vic and Andrew and a CD from Dan which I’ve been listening to all evening; ‘Nigeria Rock Special’, which is a bewildering and brilliant compilation of psychedelic afro-rock and jazz-funk from 1970s Nigeria. Ace.


- At the end of the night we raided the late-night shops for cheap beer and repaired to Dan’s; from which point on I only remember so much – fetching Ant a glass of water when he’d drunk too much, Ant throwing a tube of pringles at me, dancing to Blur with Ant in Dan’s room. And lots of other cool things which didn’t involve being drunk with Ant.

- And now we discover the strobe lights. Dan bought them for a party, so we position one at either end of the room, turn the effect to slow and switch off the lights. What remains is just a series of stills; four or five of us throwing a ball around and watching it shudder across the room, one moment visible and the next obscured. Perhaps three times out of ten someone will catch it. We holler and whoop and laugh, and miss again. I don’t mind getting older one bit.

polar books

Posted 24 Sep 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

This bookshelf, via Rosie’s lovely Old Old Fashioned blog, is absolutely brilliant! How cool is that! Sadly he costs a pretty sum; two thousand pounds. But that seems almost worth it, somehow.

eat the rich

Posted 19 Sep 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

Really enjoying Tibor Fischer’s excellent ‘Good To Be God’ at the moment which, apart from having a great plot, is full of wonderful, bleak one-liners and moments of throwaway, on-point philosophy. “This might be extremely superficial”, his protagonist speculates at one point, “But the extremely superficial, like a tissue, can often get the job done.”

The book is dark, funny and a bible for the ill-of-luck; brilliant stuff. When I’ve finished it I may come back to it here, so apologies if you read all of this again in days to come.

Here’s the last paragraph I read before I wrote this; which I love.

“The rich who’ve made themselves rich I dislike because they,typically, think it’s something to do with them. It’s like the guy with the winning lottery ticket thinking he controls the lottery”.

rushdie in the guardian

Posted 11 Jul 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

There’s a good interview with Salman Rushdie over on the Guardian site today; it’s easy to forget, given how disappointing his post-Moor’s Last Sigh books have been, how incendiary his 1980s novels really were; Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses are wonderful – and, as he is at pains to point out in the interview – incredibly funny books. His new book is out but I dunno if I’ll read it. Here’s a quick break down of my recent form with his stuff:

The Ground Beneath Her Feet (1999) – started, not finished.
Fury (2001) – started, not finished.
Shalimar the Clown (2005) – started, not finished.

Not sure how long I can keep going with this…

But anyway, Midnight’s Children is a truly brilliant book, which is why it’s won this Best of the Booker malarkey. Although I can’t work out exactly what that means, or why it is worth mentioning. Anyway, Rushdie is good on describing what he was trying to do with Midnight’s Children, how he felt it necessary to move away from the very cool, detached EM Forster-derived prose of Anita Desai and Narayan. As he points out:

“[India] wasn’t cool, it was hot. It’s a country where, even if you’re in a rural area, you’re never alone. I wanted to write the literary equivalent of a crowd. So it was a trick, a deliberate attempt to have too much incident so that you feel pushed this way and that, as if you’re in a crowd.”

He expressed pleasure that Midnight’s Children has lasted and spanned the generations, admitting to a fear that “it might just be a topical book about the birth of India and that it wouldn’t endure. The problem of telling contemporary history is that your message gets outdated.”

I’m reminded of his observation in The Satantic Verses, that:

“The history of life was not the bumbling progress–the very English, middle-class progress–Victorian thought had wanted it to be, but violent, a thing of dramatic, cumulative transformations: in the old formulation, more revolution than evolution.”

And in his hands, a potent subject for comedy too. Which brings us back to the the part of the interview I mentioned above:

Rushdie jokes about the fatwa with the audience at Temple Judea during his warm-up routine. “I don’t want to dispute with Ayatollah Khomeini, but I will point out that only one of us is dead. That thing they say about the pen being mightier than the sword? Don’t mess with novelists.”

How can Rushdie joke about the fatwa, I ask him? “Well, because what happened to me was not funny it was assumed that I’m not funny. From some of the circumstances of the attack, it was assumed that because the criticisms of my book were arcane and theological, my work must be arcane and theologicial. So there is a point to joking: to show that I was misrepresented during the fatwa period. I am funny, and so are my books!”

You can read the rest here.

If anyone wants to counter my predictable assessment of Rushdie’s later works, or offer an opinion on the new one, I’d be very glad to hear your thoughts.

sarcastic parents

Posted 05 Apr 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

Just been reading a review of Simon Armitage’s new book, ‘Gig: The Life and Times of a Rock-Star Fantasist’ in The New Statesman; the write-up echoes my thoughts about Armitage’s prose – that it’s too often unsatisfyingly blokey, only occasionally reaching the heights of his delightful poetry. It does, by the sound of things, contain plenty of anecdotes though. Most are about the deeply boring world of rock music, but there are exceptions. This one stuck out and made me laugh:

At an event attended by his parents, Armitage realises the poem he is about to read contains an expletive. “There’s a word in this poem I’ve never said in front of my mother before,” he says.

“Would it be ‘thank you’?” mutters his father.

stalin’s ghost, by martin cruz smith

Posted 17 Mar 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Reviews

In the years since Martin Cruz Smith’s 1981 classic, ‘Gorky Park’, the Californian novelist has penned no less than five follow-ups starring Arkady Renko, the put-upon Russian investigator perpetually pitted against Moscow’s underworld parade of crooks and gangsters, government-sponsored or otherwise. The fifth is ‘Stalin’s Ghost’, an exemplary thriller set in a much-changed Russia led by Vladimir Putin.

Perhaps the changes are illusory, however? Both Renko and Cruz Smith’s prose-Moscow are instantly recognisable, the former soulful and intense and the latter dark and ominous, thick with a layer of “knee deep snow … that softened the city”. It’s Spring and the snow is gradually melting, and the prologue reminds us what we know already, that “when the snow melted, bodies would be discovered”. Twenty seven years on, that extraordinary opening, those three corpses found in Gorky Park, seem as cold and fresh as ever.

As the book’s title implies, “Stalin’s Ghost” is a book much occupied with memory, eloquent on the vital stand-off between the dark secrets of the past and nostalgia. Renko, charged with investigating the return of Stalin, who has been reported stalking the depths of Moscow’s Metro system, discovers a network of corruption, murder and propaganda which has its tangled roots in post-Soviet politics, atrocities in Chechnya, and the events of the Second World War.

Cruz Smith has is an innate ability to spin complex yet accessible plot-lines around vital contemporary events; in this case, the transformation of the Russian underworld into the Establishment. But Renko himself is the author’s finest achievement, and his centrality provokes the book’s finest passages, particularly a dazzling sixteen page-long twist which had me exclaiming and thrumming my fingers against the spine in excitement.

Cruz Smith’s touch is immaculate, allowing the novel’s first half time to breathe and be dictated by personal concerns. Atmosphere is incubated, then a furious, breathless denouement is unleashed. The author has the reach to bequeath his characters real emotional complexity, combined with a ruthless touch which is equally befitting a serious novelist and a Russian gangster. Renko takes some blows for his unstinting morality, and the reader is the winner. ‘Stalin’s Ghost’ is a bruising, superb read.

jane austen book club

Posted 15 Mar 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books

It’s probably not cool to say so, but I’ve pinned my colours to the mast on this one before so I have no reservations about repeating it; I absolutely love Jane Austen’s books (and most of the film/TV adaptations, too). Anyone who tells you that they’re drippy/romantic/boring/dated hasn’t read them properly.

Over at her Of Shoes and Ships and Sealing Wax blog, Ayaan is a big fan too, and has decided to explain why she likes each book, and which book she likes best. I generally agree with her, so – without the detail – I thought I’d have a go at a top six.

1. Persuasion
2. Pride and Prejudice
3. Northanger Abbey
4. Sense and Sensibility
5. Emma
6. Mansfield Park

Anyone agree / disagree?

dajit nagra, look we have coming to dover review

Posted 25 Feb 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Reviews

I don’t read very much poetry. When I do, I tend to either grind my teeth in concentration or whoop with pleasure; either is fine with me. Difficult poetry burns at my temple but gives me little head-spins of delight, semi-translated insights. When it’s good, that is. Daljit Nagra’s much praised collection Look We Have Coming to Dover! is certainly that – a rich and heady concoction of complex constructions and tangy, noun-heavy vocabulary.

I don’t understand all of it, by any means, but I think I know what it’s about and find it fascinating and funny; the drama of being Indian in England, good and bad, the contradictions, the triumphs and the shaming defeats, big or small. The language is plain exquisite (there’s a contradiction), swelling with Nagra’s “Punglish”, which darts from evocation of sugary pomegranate to evocation of sugar-puff. There’s lots of food. In ‘Karela!’ (lots of exclamation marks, too, this is not poetry for whispering), the narrator tries to cook a dish from his past and fails. “My body craves / taste of home but is scolded / by shame of blood-desertion”.

In ‘Parade’s End’ the narrator’s Dad parks his newly-sprayed “Granada, champagne gold / by our superstore on Blackstock Road”, and heads inside to find “council mums at our meat-display” decrying “darkies from down south” and their “flash caahs!”. It’s believable stuff. When the day is done they return to encounter the sight of “the car-skin pucker, bubbling smarts / of acid”. Nagra writes:

In the unstoppable pub-roar
from the John O’Gaunt across the forecourt,
we returned to the shop, lifted a shutter,
queued at the sink, walked down again.
Three of us, each carrying pans of cold-water.
Then we swept away the bonnet-leaves
from gold to the brown of our former colour.

Nagra’s writing is full of small humiliations suffered at the hands of the Daily Mail mentality. But his characters come out fighting, too, and then some. “Vy giv my boy dis freebie of a silky blue GCSE antology”, one voice demands, with it’s Part Two which consists of;

us as a bunch of Gunga Dins ju group, ‘Poems
from Udder Cultures
and Traditions’. ‘Udder’
is all
vee are to yoo, to dis country –
‘Udder?’ To my son’s kabbadi posseee, alll
yor poets are ‘Udder’!

Before one thinks of pigeonholing Nagra’s extraordinary voice, he takes the time to pull off a series of varied literary tricks. ‘Sajid Naqvi’ is a sober, clear-eyed description of a funeral which fails to sum up the man, and ‘On the Birth of a Daughter’ a beautiful description of just that. The haunting, Pinter-esque ‘X’, meanwhile, is just a series of furious, semi-articulate punches:

u hook my arms
u hood my head
u lose my legs

& still u say
I say u harm

There are several poems in Look We Have Coming to Dover which I can’t decipher, and plenty more which I need to re-read. Despite the unfamiliar language, however, it’s really vibrant, addictive stuff, and makes me swear I’ll follow contemporary poetry a bit more closely, if this is the kind of thing I’ll find. The closing ‘Singh Song!’ – which is romantic, lustful, hilarious – might just be the greatest thing I’ve read all year, a bawdy tale set “in di worst Indian shop / On di whole Indian road”, where the narrator keeps locking the door and nipping upstairs:

cos up di stairs is my newly bride
vee share in chapatti
vee share in di chutney
after vee hav made luv
like vee rowing through Putney.

Look We Have Coming to Dover is bursting with life – a magnificent celebration of language, multiculturism, sex and humanity. Here are the final lines of that poem.

Late in di midnight hour
ven yoo shoppers are wrap up quiet
ven di precinct is concrete-cool
vee cum down whispering stairs
and sit on my silver stool,
from behind di chocolate bars
vee stare past di half price window signs
at di beaches ov di UK in di brightey moon –

from di stool each night she say,
How much do yoo charge for dat moon baby?

from di stool each night I say,
Is half di cost ov yoo baby,

from di stool each night she say,
How much does dat come to baby?

from di stool each night I say,
Is priceless baby –

Here’s the whole poem.

overdue: books in 2007

Posted 31 Jan 2008 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Reviews

The best read of the year was, for me, the excellent ‘In The Country of Men’ by Hisham Matar, a brilliant fictional insight into the world of Gaddafi’s Libya; it was tender, direct and raw. Back in March I called it a “humane work of genius”.

Also impressive this year was ‘Exit Wounds’, a beautifully rendered and moving graphic novel by Rutu Modan (reviewed by me here), Indra Sinha’s massively lively ‘Animal’s People’, and ‘The Lay of The Land’, an elegiac Richard Ford novel.

I loved dipping in to Nicola Barker’s huge ‘Darklands’ (but didn’t finish it) and Peter Ackroyd’s even-huger ‘Thames: Sacred River’.

I read a bunch of books on the Middle East and Islam in 2007, and the best were Ed Husain’s excellent ‘The Islamist’ and ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’ by the brilliant Zia Sardar.

Of the other Booker novels, Anne Enright’s ‘The Gathering’ was good, as was Lloyd Jones’s ‘Mister Pip’. ‘On Chesil Beach’, a slight, clunky and much-praised novel by Ian McEwan, wasn’t.

Worst read of the year was Chuck Palahniuk’s awful ‘Rant’.

transcending the genre

Posted 18 Nov 2007 — by Jonathan
Category Books

There’s a nice interview with Ian Rankin in today’s paper. The Guardian’s Lynn Barber is always good at this type of feature, although I find it slightly odd that she chooses to end her article with a reminder that Rankin is “a very good crime novelist, but he’s not Dickens”. A slightly sour note that surprised me. That apart, it’s well worth a read. Here’s an extract, an interesting insight into how he views his books.

Which does he consider his best novel? ‘Black and Blue was the breakthrough; that was the first time I felt I knew the guy and I could do more with the crime novel than just solve a mystery. Then last year’s The Naming of the Dead about the 2005 G8 summit; I reread it recently and I thought, “There’s nothing in there I would want to change.” And it got these fantastic reviews, you know – “Almost transcends the genre” – and sold very well, so I’m truly happy with that book. Exit Music is much quieter, more elegiac and was quite hard to write in some ways because of that.’

Here’s the full article.

exit music, by ian rankin

Posted 25 Sep 2007 — by Jonathan
Category Books, Reviews

I’ve never read much crime fiction, always been rather inclined against it, but I’ve come to feel the same way about Ian Rankin as I do about John Le Carre – he’s a simply brilliant novelist who happens to write in a genre I seldom otherwise enjoy. My lack of knowledge on the subject either inhibits or releases me, depending on whether you think someone ought to be (over)educated in the subject if they deign to offer an opinion. Is he a good crime writer? I don’t know – I don’t know what crime readers look for. I imagine they look for complexity; hidden motives, double meanings, cryptic scenarios. But not, perhaps, complexity of emotion – crimes are solved but how often is the protagonist changed? Don’t all crime novels begin and end at the same fixed points?

I don’t know enough, so I have to judge Ian Rankin not by his contribution to the genre but by his success as a writer. I don’t read his books to find out whodunnit. I read it because if indeed character development is discouraged in crime writing, Rankin breaks these rules. John Rebus, the central character of Rankin’s ongoing (and hugely popular) cop story, is a real character, larger than life. And Rankin’s writing, though not pretty, is bloody good, the Edinburgh he summons on the page startlingly vivid, the stories complex in both senses.

‘Exit Music’ (which follows Rankin’s tradition of using a song name for a title – in this instance Steve Lindsay’s) has received more press than most because it is Rebus’s swansong. Set in the same week that Alexander Litvinenko clings to life in a London hospital, ‘Exit Music’ finds John Rebus struggling to hold on to his job (which is, in turn his life) in the last week of his police career. Due for retirement, and still possessed with the burning desire to see off his great adversary, Big Ger Cafferty, Rebus finds himself once more immersed in a case and once more operating outside the rules.

Rankin’s recent Rebus novels have taken pains to locate the DI’s adventures in the context of contemporary events, and ‘Exit Music’ proves to be no exception. Indeed, combined with the drama of Rebus’s disintegrating career, this allegory of modern Scotland almost relegates the plotline to a backseat. Rankin sets out to address, in his final Rebus novel, the spectre of an independent Scotland, finding key roles for SNP ministers and national bankers alongside the requisite drug addicts and gangsters. With independence increasingly likely, Rebus finds the establishment jockying for land, power and influence, confirming his intuition that after all these years chasing the underworld, the overworld too has its share of corruption, violence and intrigue. Topically, he introduces to his cast of suspects a motley collection of Russian diplomats and ogliarchs, who he suspects are implicated in the murder of a Russian dissident poet, recently found dead outside an Edinburgh car park. With politicians, financiers and police chiefs urging him away, Rebus does what we can always rely on him doing – he gives chase.

Far more crucial, however, is the fact of his retirement. He is, we are told countless times, ‘on the scrapheap’, about to be given his ‘jotters’, finished. Rankin’s moment of genius is to take him off the case – only when he is suspended and removed from the familiar surroundings of Gayfield Square, is Rebus able to embark upon the mental journey which has escaped him throughout Rankin’s novels – dissasociation. Not that Rebus lets slip his obsession with Cafferty, or his determination to put away the murderer, but the final third of the book finds him battling the demon that he has always come up against – himself. Still a strange, utterly convincing combination of belligerant misanthropist and hero, Rebus ends the book in a way that none of us – least of all himself – could have foreseen. In a book which often opts for reflection and regret over violence (Rebus even gets away without a beating in ‘Exit Music’, when did that last happen?), Rankin conjures up a magnificent close to this most satisfying novel, Rebus pounding, punching and pumelling to the last. His role in this final book is so all-encompassing that I have to remind myself to say that Siobhan, for too long his sidekick, is a fully realised and very dynamic character too. Well worth a series of her own, you might say.

Over eighteen novels Rankin has written a crime series which is far more than the sum of its parts. It’s a body of work which provides a fascinating alternative history of modern Edinburgh, a series with a hard, powerful moral centre, a set of books which are invariably hideously involving, even if they’re not all that poetic. Most of all, of course, it’s a deep, deft and masterful portrait of John Rebus – a flawed, bigoted, loveable bastard, and one that a lot of people, I suspect, are going to miss.

more on the booker

Posted 06 Sep 2007 — by Jonathan
Category Books

From the distant Adriatic coast, a few thoughts on the booker shortlist. Well, firstly, despite the inclusion of Ian bloody McEwan, it’s well chosen. I was really pleased to see the likes of Catherine O’Flynn on the longlist, but in the end most of the six shortlisted books are, well, bloody good novels, in the scheme of things.

Here’s the shortlist

Darkmans, by Nicola Barker
On Chesil Beach, by Ian McEwan
Mister Pip, by Lloyd Jones
Animal’s People, by Indra Sinha
The Reluctant Fundamentalist, by Mohsin Hamid
The Gathering, by Anne Enright

I’m not up to speed on all of them yet, so I will reserve judgement except to say that of the four I’ve read one looks like a clear winner (Anne Enright’s ‘The Gathering’, which has just the right amount of gravitas and beauty) and one is my favourite by such a long way that it surely doesn’t stand a chance of winning! That book is Indra Sinha’s ‘Animal’s People’, upon which I have a post brewing, so I’ll save the superlatives for now.

I am prepared, incidentally – once the library get the damn thing in – to be dazzled by ‘Darkmans’, but until then it’s Enright or Sinha all the way. And we’ll leave why Gerard Woodward wasn’t on the longlist ’til another day.